The standard or quality of an institution or program is greatly measured by the qualifications of its faculty. In this light, the faculty should be composed of competent members in terms of academic qualifications, experience and professional expertise. In addition, they should manifest desirable personal qualities and high level of professionalism.
To be effective, faculty members should be properly compensated and taken care of. They must be given opportunities for continuous personal and professional development. A policy of fair and equitable distribution of teaching assignments and workload should be practiced. Likewise, objective and clear promotion criteria/ scheme should be adopted by the institution.
Click the link to access the file
Click the link to access the file
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
Systems - Inputs and Processes
S.2. Other qualifications such as the following are considered:
S.2.1. related professional experience;
S.2.2. licensure;
S.2.3. specialization;
S.2.4. technical skills and competence; and
S.2.5. special abilities, computer literacy, research productivity.
S.4. At least 50% of the faculty members have earned relevant graduate degrees.
Implementation
I.1.1. instruction;
I.1.2. research;
I.1.3. extension;
I.1.4. production;
I.1.5. consultancy and expert service; and
I.1.6. publication, creative and scholarly works.
Outcome/s
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
Systems - Inputs and Processes
S.1. Faculty recruitment is based on an Institutional Human Resource Development Plan/Program (HRDP)
Implementation
I.1.1. academic qualifications;
I.1.2. personal qualities;
I.1.3. communication skills;
I.1.4. teaching ability;
I.1.5. medical examination results;
I.1.6. psychological examination results;
I.1.7. relevant professional experiences;
I.1.8. previous record of employment;
I.1.9. technical/special skills & abilities; and
I.1.10. previous performance rating.
I.2.1. print media (newspaper, flyers, CSC Bulletin of vacant positions;
I.2.2. broadcast media (TV, radio);
I.2.3. website;
I.2.4. bulletin boards; and
I.2.5. others
I.3. A Screening Committee selects and recommends the best and most qualified applicant.
I.4. Measures to avoid professional in-breeding are observed;
Outcome/s
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
Systems - Inputs and Processes
S.1. Faculty-student ratio is in accordance with the program requirements and standards as follows:
S.1.1. lecture (1:40), maximum of 1:50; and
S.1.2. laboratory (1:25), maximum of 1:30.
S.3. The full-time faculty members are distributed among ranks and subject/specialization.
S.6. There is equitable, measurable and fair distribution of teaching load and other requirements.
Implementation
I.2. A Faculty Manual is published formalizing faculty policies, standards and guidelines.
I.3. Professional subjects are handled by specialists in the discipline/program.
I.5. Administrative arrangements are adopted when vacancies/leaves of absence occur during the term.
I.7. Teaching schedule does not allow more than six (6) hours of continuous teaching.
Outcome/s
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
Systems - Inputs and Processes
S.1. The institution has a system of promotion in rank and tenure based on official issuances.
S.2. The institution has a policy on temporary status of employment.
Implementation
I.4. The faculty concerned are officially informed of the extension, renewal or termination of their appointments.
I.7. Probationary period of at least one (1) or two (2) years is required to allow the faculty member to prove his/her worth.
Outcome/s
O.1. The faculty are satisfied with their rank and employment status.
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
Systems - Inputs and Processes
S.1. The institution has an approved and sustainable Faculty Development Program (PDP).
S.3. Every faculty member is an active member of at least one professional/scientific organization or honor society relevant to his/her assignment and/or field of specialization.
S.4. The budget allocation for faculty development is adequate.
Implementation
I.3. The institution conducts in-service training program regularly at least once per term.
I.5. The budget for faculty development is adequately allocated.
I.6. The budget for faculty development is wisely utilized.
I.7. The Faculty Development Program provides for the following:
I.7.1. adequate and qualified supervision of faculty;
I.7.2. scholarships, sabbatical leaves, research and travel grants;
I.7.3. financial support for active membership in professional organizations;
I.7.4. deloading to finish the faculty members' thesis/dissertation;
I.7.5. attendance in continuing professional education (CPE) programs such as seminars, workshops, and conferences or some in-service training courses;
I.7.6. conducting research related to the program;
I.7.7. publishing scholarly articles and research outputs; and
I.7.8. production of instructional materials (IM's).
I.10. The faculty members are given incentives for book writing, manuals/handbooks, compilations and instructional materials to keep up with new knowledge and techniques in the field of specialization.
Outcome/s
O.1. The faculty are well-trained and competent to serve the institution.
O.2. The faculty are committed to serve and support the programs and projects of the institution.
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
Systems - Inputs and Processes
S.1. The institution has a system of evaluating the faculty on the following:
S.1.1. professional performance; and
S.1.2. scholarly works.
Implementation
I.1. The faculty demonstrate skills and competencies in all of the following:
I.1.1. knowledge of the program objectives/outcome(s);
I.1.2. reflecting clearly the program outcomes in the course objectives;
I.1.3. knowledge and mastery of the content, issues and methodologies in the discipline;
I.1.4. proficiency in the use of the language of instruction;
I.1.5. the use of higher order thinking skills (analytical, critical, creative, innovative and problem-solving);
I.1.6. innovativeness and resourcefulness in the different instructional processes;
I.1.7. integration of values and work ethic in the teaching-learning process; and
I.1.8. integration of Gender and Development (GAD) activities.
I.2. The faculty promptly submits the required reports and other academic outputs.
I.3. The faculty updates lecture notes through an interface of relevant research findings and new knowledge.
I.4. The faculty serves as resource person/lecturer/consultant in the field of Accountancy.
I.5. The faculty presents papers in local, regional, national and/or international fora.
I.6. The faculty conduct extension and outreach services.
I.7. The faculty regularly updates respective course syllabi.
I.9. The faculty utilizes ICT resources and other resources in the enhancement of the teaching-learning process.
I.10. The faculty publishes papers in the regional, national and/or international magazines and journals.
Outcome/s
O.1. The faculty performance is generally satisfactory.
O.2. The scholarly works of the faculty are commendable.
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
Systems - Inputs and Processes
S.1. The institution has a system of granting compensation and rewards to its faculty and staff.
Implementation
I.1. The following fringe benefits are granted:
I.1.1. maternity leave/paternity leave with pay;
I.1.2. sick leave;
I.1.3. study leave (with or without pay);
I.1.4. vacation leave;
I.1.5. tuition fee discount for faculty dependents;
I.1.6. clothing/uniform allowance;
I.1.7. performance based bonus (PBB);
I.1.8. anniversary bonus;
I.1.9. honoraria/incentives for conducting research or for the production of scholarly works;
I.1.10. housing privilege; (optional)
I.1.11. sabbatical leave;
I.1.12. compensatory leave credit;
I.1.13. deloading to finish thesis/dissertation;
I.1.14. thesis/dissertation aid; and
I.1.15. others.
I.2. Policies on salaries/benefits and other privileges are disseminated to the faculty members.
I.3. Salaries are paid regularly and promptly.
I.6. Faculty members with outstanding performance are given recognition/awards and incentives.
Outcome/s
O.1. The faculty are satisfied with their compensation and rewards.
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
Systems - Inputs and Processes
Implementation
I.1. The faculty responsibly observe the following:
I.1.1. regular and prompt attendance to classes;
I.1.2. participation in faculty meetings and university/college activities;
I.1.3. completion of assigned tasks on time;
I.1.4. submission of all required reports promptly; and
I.1.5. decorum at all times.
I.3. The faculty exercise academic freedom juriciously.
I.4. The faculty show commitment and loyalty to the institution as evidenced by:
I.4.1. observance of official time;
I.4.2. productive use of official time;
I.4.3. performance of other tasks and assignments with or without compensation; and
I.4.4. compliance with terms of agreement/contracts (e.g., scholarships and training)
I.5. The faculty maintain harmonious interpersonal relations with superiors, peers, students, parents and the community.
I.7. The faculty show evidence of professional growth through further and continuing studies.
I.8. The faculty engage in practice which enable the faculty to demonstrate harmonious interpersonal relations with the students, parents, and the community
Outcome/s
O.1. The corps of faculty manifests a commendable level of professionalism.