The standard or quality of an institution or program is greatly measured by the qualifications of its faculty. In this light, the faculty should be composed of competent members in terms of academic qualifications, experience and professional expertise. In addition, they should manifest desirable personal qualities and high level of professionalism.
To be effective, faculty members should be properly compensated and taken care of. They must be given opportunities for continuous personal and professional development. A policy of fair and equitable distribution of teaching assignments and workload should be practiced. Likewise, objective and clear promotion criteria/ scheme should be adopted by the institution.
Click the link to access the file
Click the link to access the file
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
Systems - Inputs and Processes
S.2. Other qualifications such as the following are considered:
S.2.1. related professional experience;
S.2.2. licensure;
S.2.3. specialization;
S.2.4. technical skills and competence; and
S.2.5. special abilities, computer literacy, research productivity.
S.4. At least 50% of the faculty members have earned relevant graduate degrees.
Implementation
I.1.1. instruction;
I.1.2. research;
I.1.3. extension;
I.1.4. production;
I.1.5. consultancy and expert service; and
I.1.6. publication, creative and scholarly works.
Outcome/s
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
Systems - Inputs and Processes
Implementation
I.1.1. academic qualifications;
I.1.2. personal qualities;
I.1.3. communication skills;
I.1.4. teaching ability;
I.1.5. medical examination results;
I.1.6. psychological examination results;
I.1.7. relevant professional experiences;
I.1.8. previous record of employment;
I.1.9. technical/special skills & abilities; and
I.1.10. previous performance rating.
I.2.1. print media (newspaper, flyers, CSC Bulletin of vacant positions;
I.2.2. broadcast media (TV, radio);
I.2.3. website;
I.2.4. bulletin boards; and
I.2.5. others
I.3. A screening Committee selects and recommends the best and most qualified applicant.
I.4. Measures to avoid professional in-breeding are observed.
Outcome/s
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
Systems - Inputs and Processes
S.1. Faculty-student ratio is in accordance with the program requirements and standards as follows:
S.1.1. lecture (1:40), maximum of 1:50; and
S.2.2. laboratory (1:25), maximum of 1:30.
S.3. The full-time faculty classified by rank, subjects/specialization.
S.6. There is equitable, measurable and fair distribution of teaching load and other requirements.
Implementation
I.2. A Faculty Manual is published formalizing faculty policies, standards and guidelines.
I.3. Professional subjects are handled by specialists in the discipline/program.
I.7. Teaching schedule does not allow more than six (6) hours of continuous teaching.
I.10. Workload assignments and number of preparations follow existing workload guidelines.
Outcome/s
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
Systems - Inputs and Processes
S.1. The institution has an approved and sustainable Faculty Development Program (FDP).
S.4. The budget allocation for faculty development is adequate and wisely utilized.
Implementation
I.1.1. upgrade of educational qualifications (graduate studies);
I.1.2. attendance to seminars, symposia and conferences for continuing education;
I.1.3. conduct of research activities and publication of research;
I.1.4. giving lectures and presentation of papers in national/international conferences, symposia and seminars.
I.3. The institution conducts in-service training program regularly at least once per term.
I.5. The budget for faculty development is adequately allocated.
I.6. The budget for faculty development is wisely utilized.
I.7. The Faculty Development Program is implemented with the following
I.7.1. adequate and qualified supervision of faculty;
I.7.2. scholarship, sabbatical leaves, and research grants;
I.7.3. financial support for active membership in professional
organizations;
I.7.4. deloading to finish the faculty thesis/dissertation;
I.7.5. attendance in continuing professional education (CPE) programs such as seminars; workshops and conferences or some in-service training courses;
I.7.6. conducting research related activities to the program;
I.7.7. publishing scholarly articles and research outputs; and
I.7.8. production of instructional materials (IM’s)
I.10. Faculty are given incentives for book writing, manuals, handbooks,
Outcome/s
O.1. The faculty performance is generally satisfactory.
O.2. The faculty are committed to serve and support the programs and projects of the institution.
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
Systems - Inputs and Processes
S.1. The institution has a system of evaluating the faculty on the following:
S.1.1. professional performance; and
S.1.2. scholarly works.
Implementation
I.1. Demonstrate skills and competencies in all of the following:
I.1.1. knowledge of the program objectives/outcome(s);
I.1.2. reflecting clearly the program outcomes in the course objectives;
I.1.3. knowledge and mastery of the content, issues and methodologies in the discipline;
I.1.4. proficiency in the use of the language of instruction;
I.1.5. the use of higher order thinking skills (analytical, critical, creative, innovative and problem-solving);
I.1.6. innovativeness and resourcefulness in the different instructional processes;
I.1.7. integration of values and work ethic in the teaching-learning process; and
I.1.8. integration of Gender and Development (GAD) activities.
I.2. Promptly submit required reports and other academic outputs.
I.3. Update lecture notes through an interface of relevant research findings and new knowledge.
I.4. Serve as resource person/lecturer/consultant in the program/field of
I.5. Present papers in local/regional/national and/or international fora.
I.6. Publish papers in regional, national and international magazines and
I.8. Conduct extension and outreach activities.
I.9. Regularly update respective course syllabi.
I.10. Utilized ICT and other resources in the enhancement of the teaching-learning process.
Outcome/s
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
Systems - Inputs and Processes
S.1. The institution has a system of granting compensation and rewards to its faculty and staff.
Implementation
I.1. The following fringe benefits are granted:
I.1.1. maternity leave/paternity leave with pay;
I.1.2. sick leave;
I.1.3. study leave (with or without pay);
I.1.4. vacation leave;
I.1.5. tuition fee discount for faculty dependents;
I.1.6. clothing/uniform allowance;
I.1.7. performance based bonus (PBB);
I.1.8. anniversary bonus;
I.1.9. honoraria/incentives for conducting research or for the production of scholarly works;
I.1.10. housing privilege; (optional)
I.1.11. sabbatical leave;
I.1.12. compensatory leave credit;
I.1.13. deloading to finish thesis/dissertation;
I.1.14. thesis/dissertation aid; and
I.1.15. others.
I.2. Policies on salaries/benefits and other privileges are disseminated to the faculty.
I.3. Salaries are paid regularly and promptly.
I.6. Faculty with outstanding performance are given recognition/awards and incentives.
Outcome/s
O.1. The faculty are satisfied with their compensation and rewards.
(Click each benchmark statement to access the file)
Systems - Inputs and Processes
Implementation
I.1. Responsibly observe the following:
I.1.1. regular and prompt attendance to classes;
I.1.2. participation in faculty meetings and university/college activities;
I.1.3. completion of assigned tasks on time;
I.1.4. submission of all required reports promptly; and
I.1.5. decorum at all times.
I.3. exercise academic freedom judiciously.
I.4. show commitment and loyalty to the institution as evidenced by:
I.4.1. observance of official time;
I.4.2. productive use of official time;
I.4.3. performance of other tasks and assignments with or without compensation; and
I.4.4. compliance with terms of agreement/contracts (e.g., scholarships and training)
I.5. Maintain harmonious interpersonal relations with superiors, peers,
students, parents, and the community.
I.6. Demonstrate knowledge of recent educational trends/issues/resources in the program under survey.
I.7. Show evidence of professional growth through further and continuing
Outcome/s
O.1. The corps of faculty manifests a commendable level of professionalism.